posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26460 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21157 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22013 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22358 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22013 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22928 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23147 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22959 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23582 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23222 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23395 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24148 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23674 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24352 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23772 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24315 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24052 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24309 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23896 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23788 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24100 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23725 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23896 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24309 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24052 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24315 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23772 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24352 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23674 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24148 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23395 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23222 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23582 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24019 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23168 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22776 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22116 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21732 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22116 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22776 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23168 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22959 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21157 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


