posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24161 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19493 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20313 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20635 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20313 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21145 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21355 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21234 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21663 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21531 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21637 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22275 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21970 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22498 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22042 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22459 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22303 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22431 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22203 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21960 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22251 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22034 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22203 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22431 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22303 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22459 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22042 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22498 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21970 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22275 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21637 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21531 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21663 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22082 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21437 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20900 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20354 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19857 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20354 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20900 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21437 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21234 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19493 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


