posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21962 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17693 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18477 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18768 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18477 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19297 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19524 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19396 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19597 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19717 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19764 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20158 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20127 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20409 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20207 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20321 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20459 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20348 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20348 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20101 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20135 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20184 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20348 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20348 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20459 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20321 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20207 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20409 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20127 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20158 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19764 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19717 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19597 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19969 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19582 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18791 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18511 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17825 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18511 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18791 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19582 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19396 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17693 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.