posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21982 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17705 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18492 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18785 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18492 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19316 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19545 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19406 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19606 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19724 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19775 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20168 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20132 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20413 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20214 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20331 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20470 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20360 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20352 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20109 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20144 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20194 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20352 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20360 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20470 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20331 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20214 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20413 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20132 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20168 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19775 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19724 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19606 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19980 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19600 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18804 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18526 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17835 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18526 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18804 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19600 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19406 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17705 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.