posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26361 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21058 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21923 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22243 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21923 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22809 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23034 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22855 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23462 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23110 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23271 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24026 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23532 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24206 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23642 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24189 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23926 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24162 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23783 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23643 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23962 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23596 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23783 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24162 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23926 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24189 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23642 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24206 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23532 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24026 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23271 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23110 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23462 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23890 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23049 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22652 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22002 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21629 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22002 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22652 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23049 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22855 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21058 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


