posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25152 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20155 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20969 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21294 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20969 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21799 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22022 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21892 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22455 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22182 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22311 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23031 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22594 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23257 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22673 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23216 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22950 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23202 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22845 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22641 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23038 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22700 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22845 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23202 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22950 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23216 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22673 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23257 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22594 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23031 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22311 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22182 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22455 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22878 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22104 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21674 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21020 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20639 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21020 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21674 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22104 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21892 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20155 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


