posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26612 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21282 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22153 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22473 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22153 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23056 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23279 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23101 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23719 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23365 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23545 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24321 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23824 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24503 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23916 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24471 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24210 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24471 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24060 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23914 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24248 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23856 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24060 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24471 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24210 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24471 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23916 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24503 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23824 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24321 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23545 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23365 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23719 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24160 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23295 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22903 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22230 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21855 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22230 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22903 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23295 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23101 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21282 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


