posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26034 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20736 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21586 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21894 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21586 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22449 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22680 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22515 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23077 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22771 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22922 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23638 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23184 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23841 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23290 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23820 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23563 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23793 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23429 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23260 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23588 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23235 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23429 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23793 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23563 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23820 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23290 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23841 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23184 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23638 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22922 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22771 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23077 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23521 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22691 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22283 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21634 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21251 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21634 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22283 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22691 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22515 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20736 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


