posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13062 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11108 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11475 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11882 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11475 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12159 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12386 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12524 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12509 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12707 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12750 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12917 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13057 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13151 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13189 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13205 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13241 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13098 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13235 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13045 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12985 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12905 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13235 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13098 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13241 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13205 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13189 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13151 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13057 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12917 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12750 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12707 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12509 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12817 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12552 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12081 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11819 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11274 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11819 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12081 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12552 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12524 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11108 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.