posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12986 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11023 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11395 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11812 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11395 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12116 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12340 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12454 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12420 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12623 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12677 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12824 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12979 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13057 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13109 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13100 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13154 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13013 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13170 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12962 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12890 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12848 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13170 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13013 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13154 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13100 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13109 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13057 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12979 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12824 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12677 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12623 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12420 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12717 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12490 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11992 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11772 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11199 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11772 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11992 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12490 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12454 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11023 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.