posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25060 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20121 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20928 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21243 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20928 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21746 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21956 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21851 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22407 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22136 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22252 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22983 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22541 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23210 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22630 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23173 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22909 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23161 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22810 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22586 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22989 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22628 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22810 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23161 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22909 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23173 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22630 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23210 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22541 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22983 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22252 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22136 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22407 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22822 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22039 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21618 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20959 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20588 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20959 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21618 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22039 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21851 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20121 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


