posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26408 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21105 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21966 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22301 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21966 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22878 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23101 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22907 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23524 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23169 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23332 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24098 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23603 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24272 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23698 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24252 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23995 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24229 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23834 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23707 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24032 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23663 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23834 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24229 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23995 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24252 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23698 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24272 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23603 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24098 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23332 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23169 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23524 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23959 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23104 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22721 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22063 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21681 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22063 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22721 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23104 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22907 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21105 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


