posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26394 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21091 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21955 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22276 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21955 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22861 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23081 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22886 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23507 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23148 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23311 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24075 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23580 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24252 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23680 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24232 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23973 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24212 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23819 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23689 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24013 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23641 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23819 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24212 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23973 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24232 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23680 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24252 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23580 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24075 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23311 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23148 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23507 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23936 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23092 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22703 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22045 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21669 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22045 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22703 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23092 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22886 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21091 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


