Posts: 175136
posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25009 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20093 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20905 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21228 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20905 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21718 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21939 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21828 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22387 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22110 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22225 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22952 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22521 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23186 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22605 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23134 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22880 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23128 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22783 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22567 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22961 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22614 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22783 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23128 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22880 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23134 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22605 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23186 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22521 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22952 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22225 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22110 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22387 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22796 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22007 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21591 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20938 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20557 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20938 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21591 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22007 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21828 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20093 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.