posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23219 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18663 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19482 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19793 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19482 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20337 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20546 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20433 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20820 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20772 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20849 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21385 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21183 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21633 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21263 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21590 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21531 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21578 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21415 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21137 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21343 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21224 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21415 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21578 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21531 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21590 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21263 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21633 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21183 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21385 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20849 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20772 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20820 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21199 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20613 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19998 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19524 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18995 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19524 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19998 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20613 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20433 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18663 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.