posted on 18/11/2020 20:06Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin
Without leaving myself open to attack from pretty much any side.
But in a nutshell:
There was clearly an issue with antisemitism.
The leadership failed to adequately deal with it.
It was right to have an independent enquiry.
Starmer was right to accept the findings and act upon it.
Corbyn should have accepted the findings, even if he thought it was somewhat harsh.
Starmer had little choice but to suspend him.
I don't accept Corbyn is an antisemite.
Following his apology and acceptance of the report (gritted teeth not withstanding), allowing him back in but withholding the whip is probably the best compromise pending the due process.
The 2 extreme and fanatical responses from Corbyn die hards and those demanding the ultimate sanctions are utterly depressing.
Labour won't move on from this without an acceptance we've made a mess of this and a willingness to also accept that shouldn't mean defenestration of anyone deemed to have acted ineffectively.
The only winners are the Conservative Party, whose record of bigotry is hilariously overlooked. But we know the press will do this, so can't resort to whataboutery since we know the way of the world.
I joined the Labour Party because of Corbyn and particularly the manifesto of 2017. I'm still broadly supportive of his overall position but the last election demonstrated beyond doubt he is never going to pursuade the majority he is in anyway a viable leader so demands for him to be leader again are utterly insane.
I'm worried we will remain in a civil war while the worst government this country has EVER had somehow drive the country to ruin and get voted in again.
That's probably it.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24769 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19894 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20707 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21020 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20707 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21537 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21766 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21620 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22197 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21916 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22030 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22781 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22341 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23006 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22413 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22966 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22678 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22948 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22569 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22330 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22782 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22427 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22569 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22948 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22678 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22966 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22413 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23006 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22341 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22781 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22030 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21916 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22197 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22625 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21828 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21432 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20770 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20375 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20770 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21432 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21828 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21620 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19894 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

