posted on 19/11/2020 00:50Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
She is in a powerful position now as Starmer is terrified that she will leave the party. She is probably in her last term as a MP anyway, so isn't worried about re-election... but just whether it's Starmer or Johnson that will reward her with a peerage. Expect her to resign when Jeremy regains his place in the PLP.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24945 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20030 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20830 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21160 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20830 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21656 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21884 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21753 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22326 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22040 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22154 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22891 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22464 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23127 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22554 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23085 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22814 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23074 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22709 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22492 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22907 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22558 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22709 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23074 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22814 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23085 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22554 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23127 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22464 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22891 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22154 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22040 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22326 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22743 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21956 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21540 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20887 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20500 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20887 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21540 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21956 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21753 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20030 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

