posted on 19/11/2020 00:50Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
She is in a powerful position now as Starmer is terrified that she will leave the party. She is probably in her last term as a MP anyway, so isn't worried about re-election... but just whether it's Starmer or Johnson that will reward her with a peerage. Expect her to resign when Jeremy regains his place in the PLP.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21901 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17656 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18426 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18725 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18426 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19238 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19458 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19353 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19547 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19660 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19701 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20089 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20066 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20354 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20151 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20272 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20409 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20303 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20293 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20048 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20072 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20109 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20293 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20303 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20409 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20272 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20151 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20354 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20066 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20089 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19701 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19660 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19547 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19912 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19518 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18742 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18451 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17762 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18451 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18742 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19518 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19353 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17656 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.