posted on 19/11/2020 00:50Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
She is in a powerful position now as Starmer is terrified that she will leave the party. She is probably in her last term as a MP anyway, so isn't worried about re-election... but just whether it's Starmer or Johnson that will reward her with a peerage. Expect her to resign when Jeremy regains his place in the PLP.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24991 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20063 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20873 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21202 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20873 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21698 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21922 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21799 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22369 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22082 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22192 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22928 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22499 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23165 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22584 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23118 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22849 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23106 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22745 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22525 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22942 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22587 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22745 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23106 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22849 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23118 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22584 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23165 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22499 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22928 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22192 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22082 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22369 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22777 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21985 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21574 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20919 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20533 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20919 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21574 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21985 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21799 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20063 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

