posted on 19/11/2020 00:50Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
She is in a powerful position now as Starmer is terrified that she will leave the party. She is probably in her last term as a MP anyway, so isn't worried about re-election... but just whether it's Starmer or Johnson that will reward her with a peerage. Expect her to resign when Jeremy regains his place in the PLP.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21747 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17569 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18332 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18642 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18332 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19135 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19362 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19241 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19445 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19562 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19608 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19979 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19967 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20239 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20042 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20154 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20289 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20198 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20182 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19962 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19970 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20029 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20182 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20198 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20289 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20154 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20042 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20239 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19967 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19979 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19608 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19562 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19445 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19814 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19428 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18660 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18366 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17674 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18366 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18660 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19428 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19241 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17569 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.