posted on 19/11/2020 00:50Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
She is in a powerful position now as Starmer is terrified that she will leave the party. She is probably in her last term as a MP anyway, so isn't worried about re-election... but just whether it's Starmer or Johnson that will reward her with a peerage. Expect her to resign when Jeremy regains his place in the PLP.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21681 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17522 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18289 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18605 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18289 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19102 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19326 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19197 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19399 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19516 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19560 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19922 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19915 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20194 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19989 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20104 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20242 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20132 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20129 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19925 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19919 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19987 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20129 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20132 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20242 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20104 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19989 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20194 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19915 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19922 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19560 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19516 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19399 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19772 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19393 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18617 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18331 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17637 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18331 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18617 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19393 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19197 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17522 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.