posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23218 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18662 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19478 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19788 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19478 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20337 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20543 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20426 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20815 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20767 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20846 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21384 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21174 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21627 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21263 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21585 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21530 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21577 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21411 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21135 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21342 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21216 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21411 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21577 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21530 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21585 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21263 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21627 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21174 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21384 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20846 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20767 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20815 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21196 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20608 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19996 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19524 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18993 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19524 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19996 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20608 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20426 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18662 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.