Posts: 176136
posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26471 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21179 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22036 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22370 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22036 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22946 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23167 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22983 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23603 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23252 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23428 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24184 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23727 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24388 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23803 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24344 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24083 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24341 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23936 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23814 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24124 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23744 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23936 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24341 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24083 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24344 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23803 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24388 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23727 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24184 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23428 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23252 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23603 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24043 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23192 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22803 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22141 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21758 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22141 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22803 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23192 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22983 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21179 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.