posted on 19/11/2020 10:30go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae
I can only imagine what and where it goes
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26469 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21174 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22034 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22370 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22034 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22944 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23167 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22983 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23600 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23245 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23421 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24176 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23721 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24383 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23796 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24339 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24077 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24333 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23931 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23813 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24121 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23742 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23931 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24333 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24077 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24339 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23796 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24383 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23721 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24176 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23421 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23245 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23600 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24041 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23188 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22798 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22136 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21753 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22136 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22798 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23188 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22983 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21174 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


