Posts: 176557
posted on 19/11/2020 10:30go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae
I can only imagine what and where it goes
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27393 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21885 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22771 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23101 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22771 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23701 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23887 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23739 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24314 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23987 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24161 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24903 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24393 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25076 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24516 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25031 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24834 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25037 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24664 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24572 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24813 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24423 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24664 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25037 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24834 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25031 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24516 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25076 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24393 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24903 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24161 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23987 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24314 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24756 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23908 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23488 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22851 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22442 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22851 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23488 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23908 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23739 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21885 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.