posted on 19/11/2020 10:35Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
"In 1987 the West London Synagogue approached Islington Council with a startling proposal: to sell its original cemetery to property developers, destroying the gravestones and digging-up and reburying the bodies lying under them. This cemetery 7(dating from 1840) was not merely of great historic and architectural interest – in the view of orthodox Jews, the deliberate destruction of a cemetery is sacrilegious.
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22104 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17785 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18559 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18866 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18559 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19398 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19607 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19482 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19691 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19803 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19856 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20233 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20211 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20509 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20298 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20419 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20550 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20446 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20427 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20194 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20214 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20267 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20427 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20446 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20550 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20419 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20298 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20509 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20211 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20233 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19856 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19803 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19691 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20052 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19667 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18882 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18604 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17918 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18604 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18882 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19667 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19482 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17785 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.