posted on 19/11/2020 10:35Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
"In 1987 the West London Synagogue approached Islington Council with a startling proposal: to sell its original cemetery to property developers, destroying the gravestones and digging-up and reburying the bodies lying under them. This cemetery 7(dating from 1840) was not merely of great historic and architectural interest – in the view of orthodox Jews, the deliberate destruction of a cemetery is sacrilegious.
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26471 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21185 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22042 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22373 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22042 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22950 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23172 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22988 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23603 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23254 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23431 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24188 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23729 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24391 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23804 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24346 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24085 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24344 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23940 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23815 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24126 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23747 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23940 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24344 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24085 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24346 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23804 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24391 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23729 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24188 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23431 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23254 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23603 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24044 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23193 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22809 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22143 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21761 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22143 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22809 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23193 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22988 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21185 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

