posted on 19/11/2020 10:35Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
"In 1987 the West London Synagogue approached Islington Council with a startling proposal: to sell its original cemetery to property developers, destroying the gravestones and digging-up and reburying the bodies lying under them. This cemetery 7(dating from 1840) was not merely of great historic and architectural interest – in the view of orthodox Jews, the deliberate destruction of a cemetery is sacrilegious.
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23828 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19242 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20056 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20359 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20056 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20880 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21102 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20985 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21365 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21288 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21375 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21937 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21700 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22184 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21789 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22149 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22053 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22113 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21950 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21681 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21912 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21753 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21950 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22113 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22053 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22149 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21789 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22184 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21700 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21937 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21375 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21288 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21365 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21755 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21171 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20582 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20079 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19526 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20079 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20582 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21171 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20985 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19242 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

