posted on 19/11/2020 10:35Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
"In 1987 the West London Synagogue approached Islington Council with a startling proposal: to sell its original cemetery to property developers, destroying the gravestones and digging-up and reburying the bodies lying under them. This cemetery 7(dating from 1840) was not merely of great historic and architectural interest – in the view of orthodox Jews, the deliberate destruction of a cemetery is sacrilegious.
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24991 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20060 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20870 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21201 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20870 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21697 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21922 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21798 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22369 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22079 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22191 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22928 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22498 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23164 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22581 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23116 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22848 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23102 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22742 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22525 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22940 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22586 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22742 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23102 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22848 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23116 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22581 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23164 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22498 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22928 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22191 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22079 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22369 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22776 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21985 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21573 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20918 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20533 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20918 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21573 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21985 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21798 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20060 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

