posted on 19/11/2020 10:35Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
"In 1987 the West London Synagogue approached Islington Council with a startling proposal: to sell its original cemetery to property developers, destroying the gravestones and digging-up and reburying the bodies lying under them. This cemetery 7(dating from 1840) was not merely of great historic and architectural interest – in the view of orthodox Jews, the deliberate destruction of a cemetery is sacrilegious.
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24991 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20058 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20867 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21200 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20867 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21693 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21920 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21797 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22365 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22077 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22190 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22927 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22497 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23161 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22581 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23112 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22847 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23101 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22741 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22524 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22938 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22585 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22741 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23101 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22847 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23112 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22581 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23161 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22497 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22927 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22190 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22077 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22365 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22774 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21983 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21570 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20915 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20531 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20915 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21570 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21983 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21797 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20058 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

