posted on 19/11/2020 10:35Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
"In 1987 the West London Synagogue approached Islington Council with a startling proposal: to sell its original cemetery to property developers, destroying the gravestones and digging-up and reburying the bodies lying under them. This cemetery 7(dating from 1840) was not merely of great historic and architectural interest – in the view of orthodox Jews, the deliberate destruction of a cemetery is sacrilegious.
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21674 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17517 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18288 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18605 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18288 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19102 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19324 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19196 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19398 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19516 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19558 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19920 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19910 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20185 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19986 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20102 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20240 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20129 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20129 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19924 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19916 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19985 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20129 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20129 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20240 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20102 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19986 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20185 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19910 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19920 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19558 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19516 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19398 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19770 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19392 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18615 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18331 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17631 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18331 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18615 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19392 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19196 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17517 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.