posted on 19/11/2020 10:35Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
"In 1987 the West London Synagogue approached Islington Council with a startling proposal: to sell its original cemetery to property developers, destroying the gravestones and digging-up and reburying the bodies lying under them. This cemetery 7(dating from 1840) was not merely of great historic and architectural interest – in the view of orthodox Jews, the deliberate destruction of a cemetery is sacrilegious.
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28091 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22428 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23345 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23704 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23345 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24299 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24502 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24343 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24940 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24612 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24811 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25596 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25022 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25728 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25153 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25696 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25483 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25666 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25264 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25220 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25447 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25025 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25264 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25666 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25483 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25696 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25153 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25728 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25022 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25596 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24811 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24612 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24940 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25385 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24509 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24101 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23456 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23025 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23456 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24101 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24509 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24343 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22428 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

