Posts: 8830
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24119 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19457 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20269 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20587 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20269 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21105 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21328 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21199 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21618 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21498 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21598 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22226 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21929 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22456 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22005 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22415 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22257 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22379 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22157 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21915 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22193 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21995 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22157 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22379 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22257 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22415 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22005 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22456 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21929 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22226 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21598 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21498 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21618 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22034 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21401 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20851 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20320 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19816 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20320 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20851 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21401 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21199 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19457 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.