Posts: 8826
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24068 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19412 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20224 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20550 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20224 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21067 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21290 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21163 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21577 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21464 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21561 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22162 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21889 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22403 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21971 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22366 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22224 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22334 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22113 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21871 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22148 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21959 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22113 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22334 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22224 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22366 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21971 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22403 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21889 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22162 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21561 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21464 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21577 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21979 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21366 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20802 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20283 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19755 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20283 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20802 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21366 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21163 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19412 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.