Posts: 8810
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23254 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18714 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19537 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19840 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19537 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20397 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20602 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20474 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20865 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20811 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20897 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21426 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21217 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21669 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21297 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21620 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21564 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21615 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21447 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21178 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21398 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21265 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21447 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21615 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21564 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21620 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21297 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21669 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21217 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21426 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20897 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20811 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20865 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21235 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20663 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20047 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19589 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19048 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19589 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20047 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20663 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20474 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18714 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.