Posts: 8768
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12890 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10955 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11327 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11727 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11327 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12019 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12247 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12361 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12348 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12546 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12595 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12744 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12878 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12965 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13014 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13022 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13063 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12932 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13068 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12863 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12795 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12748 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13068 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12932 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13063 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13022 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13014 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12965 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12878 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12744 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12595 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12546 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12348 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12632 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12396 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11914 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11679 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11137 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11679 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11914 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12396 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12361 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10955 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.