posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12884 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10954 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11326 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11724 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11326 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12019 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12244 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12359 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12346 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12545 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12590 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12743 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12875 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12963 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13011 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13021 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13062 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12932 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13067 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12862 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12792 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12745 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13067 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12932 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13062 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13021 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13011 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12963 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12875 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12743 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12590 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12545 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12346 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12631 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12390 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11910 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11676 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11137 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11676 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11910 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12390 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12359 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10954 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.