Posts: 8838
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24976 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20045 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20847 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21174 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20847 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21672 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21900 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21773 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22346 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22057 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22173 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22914 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22481 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23145 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22572 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23103 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22835 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23091 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22727 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22507 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22922 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22574 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22727 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23091 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22835 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23103 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22572 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23145 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22481 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22914 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22173 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22057 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22346 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22758 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21971 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21554 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20899 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20519 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20899 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21554 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21971 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21773 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20045 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.