Posts: 8838
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24972 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20044 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20846 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21174 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20846 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21669 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21899 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21770 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22342 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22054 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22170 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22910 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22478 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23134 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22567 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23100 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22831 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23086 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22722 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22501 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22919 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22572 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22722 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23086 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22831 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23100 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22567 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23134 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22478 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22910 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22170 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22054 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22342 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22756 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21969 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21554 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20899 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20517 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20899 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21554 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21969 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21770 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20044 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.