Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21685 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17524 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18289 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18607 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18289 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19102 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19328 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19197 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19399 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19517 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19560 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19927 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19920 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20195 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19989 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20105 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20242 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20136 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20131 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19926 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19921 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19987 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20131 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20136 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20242 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20105 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19989 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20195 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19920 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19927 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19560 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19517 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19399 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19775 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19393 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18617 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18331 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17637 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18331 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18617 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19393 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19197 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17524 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.