home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 8897

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.

Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.

I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28216 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22516 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23430 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23803 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24386 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24585 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24444 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25015 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24709 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24901 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25664 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25124 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25821 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25253 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25777 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25590 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25753 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25367 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25336 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25523 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25120 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25465 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24588 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24177 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23542 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23103 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.