Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21686 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17525 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18289 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18608 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18289 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19104 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19328 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19199 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19401 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19518 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19562 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19931 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19922 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20196 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19991 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20107 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20243 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20138 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20133 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19927 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19922 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19988 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20133 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20138 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20243 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20107 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19991 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20196 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19922 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19931 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19562 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19518 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19401 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19776 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19393 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18618 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18334 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17639 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18334 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18618 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19393 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19199 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17525 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.