posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12482 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10648 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11016 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11405 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11016 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 11691 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 11900 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12016 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12000 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12209 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12257 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12382 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12527 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12596 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12657 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12662 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12686 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12576 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12713 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12505 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12443 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12389 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12713 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12576 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12686 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12662 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12657 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12596 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12527 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12382 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12257 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12209 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12000 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12284 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12049 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11581 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11349 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 10820 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11349 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11581 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12049 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12016 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10648 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.