posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28893 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22989 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23893 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24267 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23893 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24850 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25044 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24899 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25497 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25156 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25362 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26140 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25595 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26296 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25741 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26246 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26074 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26227 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25824 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25822 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25995 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25556 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25824 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26227 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26074 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26246 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25741 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26296 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25595 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26140 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25362 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25156 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25497 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25924 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25043 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24637 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23992 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23577 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23992 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24637 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25043 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24899 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22989 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


