posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23206 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18649 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19459 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19774 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19459 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20320 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20524 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20409 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20797 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20747 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20826 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21358 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21147 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21608 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21247 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21562 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21509 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21553 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21390 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21118 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21323 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21195 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21390 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21553 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21509 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21562 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21247 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21608 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21147 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21358 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20826 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20747 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20797 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21179 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20591 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19983 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19507 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18975 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19507 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19983 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20591 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20409 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18649 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.