posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23248 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18706 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19528 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19834 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19528 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20376 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20587 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20467 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20855 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20803 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20882 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21410 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21205 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21659 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21285 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21610 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21550 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21606 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21439 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21165 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21390 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21255 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21439 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21606 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21550 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21610 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21285 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21659 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21205 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21410 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20882 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20803 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20855 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21230 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20651 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20036 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19579 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19038 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19579 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20036 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20651 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20467 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18706 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.