posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24160 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19487 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20310 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20631 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20310 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21143 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21355 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21231 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21660 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21527 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21636 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22274 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21967 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22494 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22041 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22457 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22300 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22429 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22199 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21956 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22251 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22028 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22199 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22429 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22300 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22457 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22041 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22494 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21967 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22274 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21636 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21527 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21660 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22079 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21436 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20894 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20351 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19855 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20351 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20894 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21436 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21231 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19487 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


