posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21986 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17707 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18495 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18786 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18495 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19326 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19549 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19407 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19610 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19726 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19779 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20169 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20132 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20416 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20218 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20335 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20474 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20362 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20352 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20116 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20149 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20198 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20352 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20362 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20474 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20335 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20218 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20416 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20132 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20169 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19779 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19726 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19610 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19981 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19601 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18804 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18529 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17835 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18529 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18804 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19601 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19407 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17707 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.