posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13054 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11096 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11462 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11877 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11462 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12152 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12377 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12516 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12498 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12690 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12740 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12902 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13046 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13133 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13176 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13185 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13231 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13085 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13223 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13030 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12977 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12893 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13223 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13085 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13231 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13185 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13176 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13133 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13046 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12902 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12740 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12690 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12498 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12797 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12542 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12069 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11810 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11262 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11810 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12069 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12542 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12516 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11096 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.