posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12482 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10647 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11014 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11404 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11014 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 11689 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 11898 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12011 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 11999 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12206 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12256 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12381 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12525 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12595 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12656 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12661 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12686 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12574 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12713 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12504 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12440 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12387 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12713 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12574 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12686 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12661 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12656 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12595 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12525 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12381 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12256 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12206 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 11999 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12283 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12047 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11580 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11342 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 10818 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11342 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11580 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12047 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12011 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10647 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.