posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24923 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20004 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20810 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21145 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20810 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21640 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21866 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21742 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22314 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22025 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22134 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22871 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22449 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23111 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22535 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23065 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22798 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23053 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22686 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22471 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22892 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22535 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22686 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23053 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22798 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23065 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22535 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23111 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22449 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22871 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22134 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22025 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22314 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22728 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21941 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21523 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20869 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20473 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20869 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21523 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21941 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21742 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20004 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


