2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)

You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.

- A Farewell to Kings -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21602 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17365 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18239 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18544 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19065 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19276 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19141 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19341 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19455 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19497 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19874 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19849 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20112 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19902 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20028 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20170 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20064 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20065 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19863 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19760 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19920 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19712 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19247 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18545 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18280 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17580 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply