posted on 19/11/2020 11:36Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci.
This:
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21712 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17543 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18316 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18624 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18316 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19123 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19345 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19223 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19430 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19542 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19584 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19961 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19948 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20225 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20024 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20140 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20271 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20170 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20159 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19944 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19950 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20010 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20159 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20170 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20271 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20140 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20024 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20225 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19948 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19961 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19584 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19542 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19430 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19790 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19414 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18637 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18351 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17661 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18351 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18637 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19414 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19223 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17543 times)