posted on 19/11/2020 11:59Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae
It does seems strange (to an outsider) that, as their power is slipping away, the hard left are now calling for party unity, but didn't seem so keen on it when they were in control.
Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech doesn't smack much of unity either. Nor do comments like it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" or "You and I know full well it was ******", that appear to be completely dismissing the report's findings.
It does look (again to an outsider) that there is a (large?) section of Corbynistas that think there was, and is, no problems to address.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26130 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20812 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21665 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21971 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21665 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22535 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22771 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22585 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23182 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22849 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23007 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23754 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23269 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23938 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23368 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23923 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23657 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23884 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23512 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23357 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23694 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23323 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23512 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23884 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23657 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23923 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23368 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23938 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23269 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23754 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23007 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22849 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23182 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23618 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22790 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22385 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21734 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21369 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21734 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22385 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22790 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22585 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20812 times)


