posted on 19/11/2020 11:36Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci.
This:
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27706 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22144 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23052 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23378 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23052 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23986 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24184 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24039 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24608 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24278 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24470 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25231 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24685 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25386 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24820 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25348 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25144 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25350 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24965 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24877 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25104 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24706 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24965 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25350 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25144 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25348 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24820 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25386 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24685 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25231 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24470 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24278 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24608 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25054 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24199 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23778 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23137 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22726 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23137 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23778 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24199 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24039 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22144 times)

