posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29248 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23211 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24125 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24511 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24125 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25084 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25280 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25133 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25714 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25385 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25591 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26371 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25859 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26539 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25987 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26483 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26322 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26450 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26068 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26111 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26228 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25807 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26068 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26450 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26322 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26483 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25987 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26539 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25859 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26371 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25591 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25385 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25714 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26164 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25284 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24864 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24230 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23794 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24230 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24864 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25284 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25133 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23211 times)


