posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21377 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17245 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18052 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18363 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18052 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18852 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19040 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18956 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19170 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19271 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19307 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19692 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19668 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19935 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19722 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19840 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19978 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19867 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19893 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19685 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19628 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19720 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19893 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19867 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19978 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19840 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19722 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19935 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19668 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19692 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19307 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19271 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19170 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19542 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19104 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18367 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18075 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17400 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18075 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18367 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19104 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18956 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17245 times)