posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae
"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"
We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"
Plus ca change
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12968 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10972 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11340 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11742 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11340 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12053 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12278 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12383 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12369 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12565 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12618 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12763 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12900 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12986 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13033 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13043 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13083 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12953 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13090 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12894 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12817 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12774 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13090 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12953 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13083 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13043 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13033 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12986 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12900 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12763 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12618 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12565 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12369 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12659 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12427 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11936 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11714 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11154 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11714 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11936 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12427 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12383 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10972 times)