posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae
"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"
We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"
Plus ca change
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13144 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11145 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11511 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11925 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11511 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12205 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12434 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12564 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12564 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12751 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12799 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12974 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13100 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13189 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13226 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13245 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13279 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13148 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13284 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13091 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 13031 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12952 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13284 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13148 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13279 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13245 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13226 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13189 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13100 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12974 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12799 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12751 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12564 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12865 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12602 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12129 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11868 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11315 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11868 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12129 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12602 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12564 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11145 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.