posted on 19/11/2020 11:36Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci.
This:
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13165 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11169 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11529 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11941 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11529 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12233 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12459 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12588 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12583 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12778 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12828 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12994 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13130 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13213 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13258 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13271 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13315 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13172 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13317 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13125 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 13064 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12986 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13317 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13172 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13315 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13271 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13258 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13213 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13130 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12994 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12828 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12778 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12583 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12887 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12623 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12153 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11891 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11354 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11891 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12153 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12623 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12588 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11169 times)